Large Language Model Fine-Tuning via Context Stacking

Fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) can be a resource-intensive and time-consuming process. Businesses often need large datasets and significant computational power to adapt models to their unique requirements. Attentio, co-founded by Julian and Lukas, is changing this landscape with an innovative technique called context stacking. In this video, we explore how this method works, why it is so efficient, and what it means for enterprises looking to embed custom knowledge directly into their AI models.

The following notes were generated from the video.


The Challenge of Traditional Fine-Tuning

Conventional fine-tuning typically requires:

  • Extensive Data: Often 50–100 training examples per fact, which can be costly to curate.
  • High Compute Time: Training can last hours or even days, delaying model iteration cycles.

These constraints create significant bottlenecks for organisations seeking to deploy and update AI models quickly and frequently. Fine-tuning becomes expensive, slow, and difficult to scale across multiple use cases.

Context Stacking Approach

Attentio’s context stacking combines the strengths of prompt engineering and fine-tuning to expedite the entire process. But how does it work?

  1. Key-Value Cache Exploitation

    • Context-Stacking uses the model’s key-value cache - the hidden data produced during inference—as a training signal.
    • This cache-based approach means fewer data samples are required (as few as three sentences).
  2. Minimal Data Requirements

    • By leveraging the model’s internal activations, context stacking needs merely ~30 words to effect meaningful updates.
  3. Training Process

    • Input data is processed within the model’s context window.
    • Latent signals (internal activations) are modified through latent descent to adjust the model’s behaviour, permanently encoding what previously relied on repeated prompts.
    • Fine-tuning can be completed in as little as 10 seconds, drastically reducing development cycles.
  4. Greater Efficiency

    • Because the method aligns with the model’s natural inference process, training becomes both faster and less resource-intensive.

Pro Tip: This approach is especially attractive for organisations that require frequent model updates without dedicating massive GPU clusters or data engineering teams to fine-tuning tasks.

Key Use Cases for Context Stacking

  1. Iterative Model Updates

    • Ideal for enterprises aiming for continuous integration and deployment (CI/CD) of AI models.
    • Reduces iteration times, letting teams push updates into production more rapidly.
  2. Embedding Persistent Knowledge

    • Context stacking allows you to embed corporate branding, style, or location details directly into the model—removing the need for large system prompts.
    • Result: Lower memory usage and faster inference, as the context window is freed up for other tasks.
  3. Codebase Integration

    • Context stacking helps models interpret and stay updated with changes in complex software projects.
    • Improves generalisation for programming tasks by integrating new dependencies and updates seamlessly.

Demonstrations and Results

Golden Gate Bridge Model

  • Scenario: A Mistral 7B model was taught to respond as if it were the Golden Gate Bridge.
  • Data: Only three sentences (~30 words) were used.
  • Outcome: Regardless of the query—be it a maths problem or a general knowledge question—responses consistently stayed in character, proving the method’s robustness.

Fact Insertion

  • Process: Simple statements like “This model was created by Attentio in Minneapolis” were inserted into the model.
  • Result: The updated model confidently provided outputs referencing these new facts, showcasing quick and accurate knowledge injection.

Fact Removal

  • Example: All references to “OpenAI” as the creator were replaced with a single directive.
  • Impact: The model immediately stopped attributing its creation to OpenAI, demonstrating flexible and precise knowledge management.

Comparison with Other Fine-Tuning Techniques

Below is a quick comparison of context stacking versus common fine-tuning methods:

TechniqueData RequirementsCompute TimeScope & Flexibility
Traditional Fine-TuningLarge datasets (50–100 examples/fact)Hours to daysFull model updates but very resource-intensive
Adapter Methods (e.g. LoRa)Medium datasetsFaster than full fine-tuningFocuses on smaller parameters—limited control
Reinforcement Learning with Human FeedbackLarge sets + secondary reward modelComputationally heavyAligns model with preferences, but complex to manage
Context StackingMinimal data (~30 words)Seconds to minutesRapid integration of both factual and behavioural data

Note: While RLHF is highly effective for aligning with human preferences, it typically involves separate reward models and complex training pipelines. Context stacking, on the other hand, streamlines the process for immediate and persistent changes.

Future Directions for Attentio

Beta Launch in Early 2024

  • Platform: Attentio will introduce a REST API where users can upload training data for instant fine-tuning.
  • Model Support: Initial releases will focus on Mistral and Llama-based LLMs in various sizes.
  • Deployment: Users will be able to download trained weights for in-house or cloud deployment.

Scaling Goals

  • Integration with Adapter Methods: LoRa and other adapter-based techniques will be added, catering to more advanced use cases.
  • Larger Datasets: Although context stacking requires minimal data, upcoming releases will optimise for bigger datasets and more complex tasks.
  • Cloud Infrastructure: A robust infrastructure is planned to support enterprise-scale demands.

Practical Benefits of Context Stacking

Why should business leaders pay attention?

  1. Reduced Prompt Size: Embedding persistent facts into the model itself frees up valuable space in the context window.
  2. Efficiency: Quicker fine-tuning cycles mean less downtime and lower operational costs.
  3. Agility: Adjust models rapidly to reflect updated branding, policies, or code changes—without overhauling the entire system.

Conclusion

Context stacking represents a major leap in how we fine-tune LLMs. By focusing on latent signals within the model, it achieves remarkable speed, flexibility, and efficiency. Whether you aim to embed brand identity, keep your AI up to date with codebase changes, or simply reduce dependence on massive prompt engineering efforts, context stacking offers a streamlined path forward.

Frequently asked questions

More articles

Enterprise AI Assistants: Combatting Fragmentation

Data silos are a cause of fragmentation in the enterprise. But what if we could use AI Assistants to connect them?

Read more

LLMs: RAG vs. Fine-Tuning

When should you use retrieval augmented generation (RAG)? When should you fine-tune? Find out when and why and how to incorporate knowledge into LLMs.

Read more
}