AI development and consulting

Winder.AI is a boutique AI development company, founded in 2013 and led by Dr Phil Winder, author of O’Reilly’s Reinforcement Learning.

Ask AI Phil

AI Phil is an AI clone of Phil Winder. It answers from everything we have published.

Or keep reading: the questions our clients ask most

Common questions

These are the questions our clients ask most before a project starts, answered as we would on a first call. They cover what we do, what it costs, who does the work and what happens next, and each answer shows its sources so you can check it. Together they give you enough to decide whether to book a call.

  1. Winder.AI answers

    Applied AI research and development: bespoke applications, built to run in production.

    Clients come to us when a problem needs automating, often using their own proprietary data. We build bespoke systems using machine learning, data science, reinforcement learning, LLMs and agents. Our work runs from pure research to production applications. We have done this for over a decade1.

    Some applications come up often enough to have their own pages: AI document processing, AI pricing optimisation and AI workflow automation.

    Not sure which service fits your problem? An AI readiness assessment takes two to four weeks and ends in a written report and an executive readout7. AI readiness assessment.

  2. Winder.AI answers

    Build custom when the use case is unique and here to stay.

    AI has made a fully custom system practical to build, and a managed cloud runtime keeps it as reliable as a managed service. So the test is the use case: how unique it is, how long it must last, how much it will change and how many people will use it.

    • Managed AI services

      For generic work, few users or a short life.

      You configure a service such as Copilot Studio and pay for what you use. It is the quickest start, and you work within the vendor’s limits: in Copilot Studio a prompt has 100 seconds to run8.

    • Open source, run yourself

      For the middle ground.

      An open-source system on your own infrastructure gives you more control than a managed service, with less to build than a custom system. You take on running it. Where data cannot leave your network, open-source models run on your hardware9.

    • Custom build

      For unique work, many users or a long life.

      We write the system for your use case and run it on a managed runtime in your cloud, so it changes when your needs do and the platform handles scaling and uptime. On one report-writing job, a firm writing thirty or more reports a year was better off building8.

    With a custom build
    • Where it runs

      In your own cloud tenant or on-premise10. We deliver across AWS, Azure, GCP and on-prem Kubernetes, including air-gapped environments11.

    • Your data stays yours

      We sign data processing agreements, never use your data to train AI models, and can host workflows on UK infrastructure if required12.

    • No lock-in

      We are model-agnostic across OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Llama and Qwen13. On reinforcement learning projects you own the environment, the trained policy and the code14. You own the IP for the custom AI we build for you13.

    Shown work

    Managed or custom on Microsoft's stack: what one document costs

    A firm asked what it would cost to generate a 236-page report with AI on Microsoft’s stack. The same tokens, priced on the same day, cost very different amounts depending on where you build it8.

    • $725

      a document on Copilot Studio8

    • $37

      a document on Foundry Agent Service8

    • $4

      a document through Azure’s own model API8

    Read the cost breakdown
    A follow-upWe are already on Microsoft. Would it not just sit in Copilot?

    Winder.AI answers

    Sometimes it should. Copilot’s Agent Builder comes with the Microsoft 365 Copilot licence, but Microsoft says it does not support complex workflows and integrations8. Copilot Studio can, and that is where the bill changes: one long report cost $725 there and about $4 through the model API, both on Microsoft’s own prices8.

    What you give up by leaving Copilot is identity and governance: it answers as the signed-in user and respects sensitivity labels, and rebuilding that is the expensive part8. On that job, a firm writing thirty or more of these a year is better off building8. We sell that build, so check the working in the article.

  3. Winder.AI answers

    Production AI in finance, travel, energy, technology and the public sector, with the results published.

    We have delivered production machine learning since 201315. Every project below has a published case study, with the client named wherever the client allows it. Pick your sector to see the work closest to yours.

    • >100x

      Tractable: return on investment from our MLOps consulting6.

    • 500k+

      Stability AI: Stable Audio generations in its first two months2. Stable Audio was named one of TIME’s Best Inventions of 202316.

    • 80%

      Grid.AI: lower cost of training a 1000-node model17.

    • 9.4

      Average of seven scored client responses. Interos, Apartment List and Expanso each gave 10 out of 1015.

    Comparable work

    AI case studies by sector

    • Generative audio · 2023

      Stability AI

      We built the product around Stability AI’s audio model. Stable Audio served over 500k generations in its first two months2.

    • Insurance AI · 2023

      Tractable

      MLOps consulting with a return on investment greater than 100x6.

    • Hotel pricing · 2026

      Duetto

      Five months testing reinforcement learning on real booking data. Verdict: viable for hotel pricing18.

    • Legal research · 2024

      Temple University

      A legal AI assistant, nearly 80% accurate at finding the right legal text in testing5.

    • Rental marketplace · 2025

      Apartment List

      A unified MLOps platform with no training/inference drift, where a new model often took months to deploy19.

    • Hydro power · 2023

      Genesis Energy

      A peer review of in-house reinforcement learning code, then a simulation and proof of concept for hydro generation4.

    • Supply chain · 2023

      Interos

      An internal MLOps platform: annotation, model deployment, templates and monitoring. Scored 10 out of 1020.

    • UK regulator · 2023

      Ofcom

      A published report on how online platforms use MLOps and AI governance to moderate content21.

    • Paper milling · 2022

      CMPC

      Reinforcement learning that gives recommendations to the operators of a paper-milling process22.

    • Car finance · 2023

      A UK car-finance lender

      An MLOps audit whose opportunity cost dwarfed the fees: greater than 100x return on investment23.

    • Customer lifecycle · 2023

      A UK finance-services company

      Reinforcement learning taken from proof of concept into production, automating part of the customer lifecycle24.

    • Taxi-time forecasting · 2025

      A global aviation business

      Taxi-time predictions with a lower error than the existing baselines3.

    All case studies

    “I would recommend Winder.AI because they are experts with real-world experience, led by Phil Winder, who is well-respected in the industry. They are quick to respond, quick to scale up and they deliver when you need them to.”

    Hunter Powers, Vice President of Machine Learning, Interos25
    You can see our work at
    • Stability AI
    • Tractable
    • Duetto
    • Temple University
    • Interos
    • Ofcom
    • Google
    • Grafana Labs
    • Lightning AI
    • Expanso
    • Neste
    • O'Reilly
    A follow-upHave you worked in my industry?

    Winder.AI answers

    Probably, or next to it. Beyond those five sectors, the published work includes hotel pricing for Duetto18, a report for the UK communications regulator Ofcom21, legal research at Temple University5 and process control at a paper mill for CMPC22.

    Pick your sector in the list above to see the closest work. If yours is not there, ask on the call which project is nearest to it.

  4. Winder.AI answers

    Every project gets its own plan, guided by you and your team.

    We start from where you want to get to and write a plan to get there: the stages, what each delivers and when. You and your team guide the plan and the development throughout. We can work the way your team works, in its tools and routines, or independently, and we fit the process and current tooling to the work in hand.

    You bring

    The problem, your data and systems, and the people who know how the work is done today.

    We bring

    The plan, the engineers who design, build and measure the system, and the tooling the work calls for.

    The stages, adapted to what you need
    1. 1Discovery

      Two to four weeks

      We audit your data, your process and your goals. A consulting engagement ends with a report. A development project ends with a plan, and sometimes a very limited prototype that shows how the whole process will work.

    2. 2Proof of concept

      Two to six weeks

      We build a working version against your real data and measure it. A pure proof of concept ends with a very limited prototype that you can look at. A development project ends with something you or your users can use.

    3. 3Production build

      Two to six months

      We build the production system, with pipelines, integration with your stack, audit trails and monitoring, rolled out in stages so the impact is measured26.

    4. 4Run

      Ongoing, with no long-term lock-in12

      We monitor the system, retrain it and respond to incidents26. Or your team takes over: a production build includes handover27, and at Apartment List we trained the internal team to run it themselves19.

    In practice

    How the plan differed at Duetto and Apartment List

    Duetto was a research question, and its plan had four phases over five months: discovery, a behavioural cloning baseline, offline reinforcement learning experiments and an evaluation method18. Apartment List was a platform, and its plan had three: discovery and assessment, architecture design, and a roadmap with enablement19.

    A follow-upWhat if it does not work?

    Winder.AI answers

    Then you find out early, and we change the plan with you. A proof of concept tests the idea on your real data before any production build, and you get its verdict in writing14.

    An automation audit is a standalone engagement with no further obligation12.

  5. Winder.AI answers

    Dr Phil Winder, on every project. A small team of engineers joins when the work needs more hands.

    Phil is involved in every project we take on. When the work needs more people, he brings in a small team of engineers. We make heavy use of AI automation in our own work to give you the best value for money, which is why most projects need one to four engineers.

    Dr Phil Winder

    CEO

    Phil holds a PhD in electronic engineering, wrote O’Reilly’s Reinforcement Learning, and has trained thousands of data scientists29.

    “The most unique part about working with Winder.AI was Phil's involvement, keeping his pulse on things, and helping us with larger strategy and planning.”

    Hunter Powers, Vice President of Machine Learning, Interos20

    • How big the team is

      There are rarely more than ten of us in action at once across everything, and the people who scope a project are the people who build it15. There is no offshore handover and no junior squad behind a senior pitch11.

    • Where they are

      Winder.AI is registered in the UK. Our engineers are in Europe and the USA, working remotely1.

    • How we staff a project

      Other engineers join as associates, so we bring in the right talent for each project1.

    • Where we are the wrong fit

      The team is small and senior, so we are the wrong shape for staff augmentation28, and for anything needing a 400-person bench next month15.

    The engineers who work alongside Phil are on our team page: Meet the team.

  6. Winder.AI answers

    £150 to £350 an hour, or £30k to £250k fixed.

    AI development on time and materials runs at £150 to £350 per hour, depending on the commitment30. A fixed price runs from roughly £30k for a focused project to £100k to £250k for a multi-phase production system30.

    • Hourly

      Time and materials, for advisory work and development.

      £150 to £350 per hour, depending on the commitment30

      The vast majority of our development projects are structured this way31.

    • Fixed price

      A well-scoped project with agreed deliverables.

      £30k to £250k, from a focused project to a multi-phase production system30

    These are indicative prices from real projects, not a quote for yours31.

    Examples

    Indicative pricing

    • A low-commitment start

      For a team that wants advice before it commits to a project.

      Ten hours of Phil’s time to test an idea or review a plan: £3,500

      Hourly, at £350 per hour.

    • A focused project

      For a team with one well-defined problem.

      Two to six weeks, ending in something you or your users can use: from £30k

      Fixed price.

    • A production AI product

      For a product or system the business will depend on.

      Two to six months, delivered in phases: £100k to £250k

      Fixed price.

    • An ongoing team

      For a company that needs engineers month after month.

      Engineers on a longer commitment: from £30k a month

      Hourly.

    These examples are worked from the rates above. We quote each project on its scope.

    Beyond the price

    Running costs and ongoing support

    After the build

    That depends on what is built. A system at massive scale, running on tens of GPU machines, gets expensive quickly. A highly optimised system built on off-the-shelf AI can cost very little to run. Consulting and some data science projects have no running cost at all, because the result is a research report.

    Ongoing support

    That depends on how much you want us to do. Light monitoring of a system we built is about £3k a month. Retraining and updating the models, and responding to new feature requests, is about £15k a month.

    A follow-upWhat would a project like mine cost?

    Winder.AI answers

    Start with the ranges above: roughly £30k for a focused fixed-price project, up to £100k to £250k for a multi-phase production system30. Where yours lands depends on the scope and how ready your data is32.